DocoMatic
  • city
  • California · Sacramento County
  • 2027 cohort · 196 days left

City of Sacramento: ADA Title II document accessibility deadline and status

Our September 24, 2026 crawl of cityofsacramento.gov(opens in new tab) found 4,859 public documents, about 400,256 pages. 7 of the 50 files we checked passed basic machine checks.

Claim the page at no cost to see every document we found and each file's results. Work at City of Sacramento? Claim or correct this page.

documents found
4,859
estimated pages
400.3K
checked files passed
7 / 50
crawl date
Sep 24, 2026

What our crawl found on cityofsacramento.gov

Counts from our September 24, 2026 crawl, which visited 75 pages. Our crawler found 4,859 public documents on cityofsacramento.gov — an estimated 400,256 pages your team would otherwise inventory by hand.

Documents by category

  • Reports2,082 · 43%
  • Other1,460 · 30%
  • Forms590 · 12%
  • Agendas & minutes426 · 9%
  • Policies288 · 6%
  • Newsletters13 · <1%

Long-form reports account for the largest share of this inventory (43%). Their length drives page counts up, but consistent templates usually make them efficient to remediate in batches.

By file format

  • PDF 4,807 · 99%
  • Excel (XLSX) 24 · <1%
  • Word (DOCX) 20 · <1%
  • PowerPoint (PPTX) 8 · <1%

Checked sample

7 of 50 passed(14%)

  • Passed basic checks: 7
  • Did not pass: 43

Most checked files are missing basics such as tags, a document title, a declared language or labeled form fields. Files made without accessibility tooling usually look like this, and they need structural work, not touch-ups.

The rate covers the 50 files we checked, not all 4,859 documents. Checks cover tag structure, document language, title, image alt text and form-field labels.

Scanned share

2% scanned

Most of the collection is digital-native text, which keeps remediation at the lighter end: tagging and structure work rather than OCR.

Scanned images need text recognition (OCR) before they can be tagged.

Forms make up 12% of the documents. Forms take the most work to fix, since every field needs a label and a logical tab order.

Crawl scope

Crawl date
September 24, 2026
Pages visited
75
Documents in the inventory
4,859
Files checked
50
Limits hit
None reported

These are machine checks on a sample, not a compliance finding, and they say nothing about the people who publish City of Sacramento's documents. The results for the sampled files are public above. The full inventory of every document we found, with detailed per-file reports, is available to verified staff of City of Sacramento after claiming this page.

Files we checked on cityofsacramento.gov

Links go to the files on cityofsacramento.gov as we found them on September 24, 2026.

These are automated checks on a sample of files as published on September 24, 2026. They are not a legal compliance finding and don't cover reading order, alt-text quality or table structure. Something wrong? Ask for a correction or removal.

Show
The 50 files checked in the sample, with each file's result
FileCategoryResultChecks not passed
PLANNING AND BUILDING00NOAI-for-Stone-Beetland-P21042 · PDF · 1 pageAgendas & minutesDid not passDocument language
PARKWAY PLAZA NEIGHBORHOODAppendix-B Air-Quality-Emissions-Modelling · PDF · 55 pagesAgendas & minutesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
PARKWAY PLAZA NEIGHBORHOODAppendix-E Traffic-Report January-2023 · PDF · 41 pagesAgendas & minutesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
P17-024 RODPDF · 79 pagesAgendas & minutesDid not passTagged structure, Document title, Image alt text
Sacramento-2040-Meeting-in-a-Box---AgendaPDF · 1 pageAgendas & minutesDid not passDocument title
CDD-0114 SPRR-Plan-Review-RequestPDF · 1 pageFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0187-Exemption-Windows-DoorsCDD-0187-Exemption-Windows-Doors · PDF · 3 pagesFormsDid not passForm field labels
CDD-0196 Agent-for-Contractor-Authorization-FormPDF · 1 pageFormsDid not passDocument title
CDD-0200 Application-for-Building-Permit Part-IPDF · 4 pagesFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0204 Agent-for-Owner-Authorization-FormPDF · 1 pageFormsDid not passDocument title
CDD-0220 Owner-Builder-FormPDF · 4 pagesFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0269 Deferred-Submittal-or-Revision-Intake-FormPDF · 1 pageFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0270 Plan-Review-Resubmittal-FormPDF · 1 pageFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0304 Re-roof-Permits-Cert-of-Compliance-with-CA-Energy-CodePDF · 3 pagesFormsDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
CDD-0431 Master-Plan-Application-for-Residential-Subdivision-DevelopmentPDF · 2 pagesFormsDid not passDocument title
5773620030142--Resolution-Ratifying-the-Negative-Declaration-and-Adopting-the-MMP-for-the-Gateway-West-Bu · PDF · 8 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
PDF MAKEMetropolitan-Reso2008-498 · PDF · 64 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
Microsoft Word - DRAFT Update Report 8-6-25MIHO Feasibility Study 8-7-25 · PDF · 193 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
R2010-572 AdoptingtheFindingsofFactPDF · 52 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title, Image alt text
R2025-0307 Amending the Sacramento 2040 General Plan to Correct Typographical Errors and Clarify Text for the Employment Mixed-Use DesignationPDF · 13 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title, Image alt text, Form field labels
15th and L Street Hotel, P05-162Reso 2015-0372 Adopting MND Addendum and MMP for Jessie Ave TM · PDF · 154 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
108370Reso-2007-0877-Certifying-EIR · PDF · 55 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Image alt text
Shasta Park Reservoir Reso 2012-138PDF · 66 pagesPoliciesDid not passTagged structure, Document title, Image alt text
TPP-Final-Admin-ProceduresPDF · 20 pagesPoliciesDid not passDocument title, Form field labels
Sacramento-2040 Outreach-Phase-1-NewsletterPDF · 19 pagesNewslettersDid not passTagged structure, Document title, Image alt text
04-25-2000 Preservation-ElementPDF · 84 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title, Image alt text
2040 GP 0-00 Cover and Table of Contents Amended 20251118PDF · 7 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title, Image alt text
2040 GP 1-02 Sustainabiity and Equity Amended 20251118PDF · 6 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title
TOWNSHIP 9 CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE PLANSAppendix-C---Consistentcy-with-Applicable-Plans · PDF · 10 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Document language
CDD-0316 Electronic-Plan-Check-(EPC)-Submittal-Verification-ChecklistPDF · 2 pagesReportsDid not passDocument title
R-Street-HDP 9-2024PDF · 11 pagesReportsDid not passDocument language, Document title
NOTICE OF PREPARATIONRDSP NOP 2026-01-05 Final · PDF · 6 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Image alt text
Sacramento Heat Mitigation TAP Final ReportPDF · 38 pagesReportsDid not passTagged structure, Document title, Image alt text
7-R2025-0244 Item 19 2025-01397 (B&C) - signed.pdf2026 Meeting Calendar - Preservation Commission · PDF · 1 pageOtherDid not passTagged structure, Document language
32 - Final EIR ErrataPDF · 8 pagesOtherDid not passDocument title
3DT-FordP04106-MNDErrata-72905PDF · 130 pagesOtherDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title, Image alt text
City Council and Standing Committee Calendars - Upcoming YearPDF · 3 pagesOtherDid not passDocument title
EVSE-Installation-FAQs April-2020PDF · 2 pagesOtherDid not passDocument title, Image alt text
Microsoft Word - cover.docFinal-Sac-Reg-2007 · PDF · 218 pagesOtherDid not passTagged structure, Document language
Historic Districts Survey AreasPDF · 1 pageOtherDid not passTagged structure, Document language, Document title
IBPDesignGuidelinesPDF · 22 pagesOtherDid not passTagged structure, Document title, Image alt text
SecInterior REHAB Standards 052013 UpdatePDF · 1 pageOtherDid not passDocument title
New Construction or Substantial Improvement in a FloodplainSubstantial Improvement Brochure · PDF · 3 pagesOtherDid not passDocument language
AgendaDirector Minutes 3-21-24 · PDF · 2 pagesAgendas & minutesPassedNone
AgendaDirector Minutes 4-11-24 · PDF · 3 pagesAgendas & minutesPassedNone
AgendaDirector Minutes 4-18-24 · PDF · 3 pagesAgendas & minutesPassedNone
AgendaDirector Minutes 4-25-24 · PDF · 2 pagesAgendas & minutesPassedNone
AgendaDirector Minutes 5-16-24 · PDF · 2 pagesAgendas & minutesPassedNone
export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/8f361eca-1139-4940-9bec-52ab7013a1d6/download/Universal Design Ordinance · PDF · 8 pagesPoliciesPassedNone
PowerPoint PresentationRDSPU SEIR Scoping Meeting Slides · PDF · 13 pagesReportsPassedNone
Show all 50 files

What each check looks for

Tagged structure
The file has a tag tree, so assistive technology can tell headings, lists and paragraphs apart.
Document language
The file declares its language, so screen readers pronounce it correctly.
Document title
The file has a document title, shown instead of the file name.
Image alt text
Every image in a tagged file carries alternative text, or the file has no untagged images.
Form field labels
Every fillable form field has a label a screen reader can announce.

How we measured this

  1. 1.Crawl

    We start at the organization's website and follow its sitemaps and links on the same site. We respect robots.txt and crawl delays, and skip login areas.

  2. 2.Classify

    Each document is sorted by file format and, from its link text and file name, into a category such as forms or agendas. Page counts are estimated, often without downloading the whole file.

  3. 3.Check a sample

    We open up to 50 PDFs and run basic machine checks: tags, document title, language, image alt text and form-field labels.

  4. 4.Publish only with evidence

    Figures appear only when a crawl finds at least 25 documents and checks at least 20 of them.

Limits of this method

  • We only see public pages we can reach through links or sitemaps. Documents behind logins or on other services may be missed.
  • Crawls stop at page, document and time limits. When one is hit, the counts are minimums.
  • Categories and page counts are estimates from links, file names and file metadata.
  • Machine checks can't judge reading order, alt text quality or table structure. Passing them is not WCAG 2.1 AA conformance.
  • Figures describe the site on the crawl date, not today.

This page's evidence

  • Crawled September 24, 2026: we fetched 75 pages from https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/ and found 4,859 documents.
  • The pass rate comes from machine checks on 50 of those documents, not from checking every file.
  • Changelog: September 24, 2026 — inventory refreshed from the latest crawl.
  • How we crawl, classify and check documents

Plan the work before April 26, 2027

With 196 days left, start with the documents people use most and fix the rest in batches.

Where City of Sacramento should start

Start with the documents residents actually download: agendas, minutes, permit applications and utility forms.

Residents need these files to apply for permits, pay for services and follow council decisions.

Serving 524,943 people means many departments publish documents; a central inventory with department owners keeps the work moving.

Usually owned by the city clerk, communications and department heads.

A timeline to April 26, 2027

  1. Inventory and triage

    by November 10, 2026

  2. Fix the documents people use most

    by February 7, 2027

  3. Everything in use conforms

    by April 26, 2027

A planning split of the time left, not a legal requirement.

Estimated cost with DocoMatic

$368,970 – $553,455

≈ 1,844,850 credits for 400,256 estimated pages

  • 48,601 form pages at Level 3 (field labeling and tab order)
  • 7,033 scanned pages (OCR plus Level 2 tagging)
  • 344,622 standard pages at Level 1

This is a directional estimate from crawler statistics, not a quote. Run the remediation cost calculator with your own page counts for a tailored figure.

What DocoMatic does

  • Finds the PDF, Word, PowerPoint and Excel files on your website and estimates the backlog.
  • Fixes documents at three levels, from basic tagging to complex forms.
  • Checks every fixed file, with veraPDF PDF/UA-1 validation from Level 2 up.
  • Human review: turn it on when you request a fix, or arrange it with our team.
  • Monitors your site so new documents don't rebuild the backlog.

Is this your organization?

If you work at City of Sacramento, claim this page at no cost with an email address on cityofsacramento.gov. You can check the figures, choose which ones are public and see the file-level inventory in the app.

Claiming isn't an admission of anything. It gives your team control of what this page shows.

Claim this page

Something wrong or out of date?

Tell us what to fix. Our team reviews every request and replies by email.

Request a correction or takedown

If you represent City of Sacramento and something on this page is wrong, tell us. Requests are recorded, reviewed by DocoMatic staff and answered by email. If a takedown request is accepted, this page stops publishing statistics about City of Sacramento.

What are you asking for?

At least 20 characters. Name the figures you dispute if you can.

Compare with similar organizations

City of Sacramento beside the cities in California closest to it in population that also have published reports.

OrganizationPopulationDocuments foundEstimated pagesCrawled
City of Sacramento (this page)524,9434,859400,256September 24, 2026
City of Fresno542,1071,630+74,341September 24, 2026
City of Long Beach466,7421,83038,606September 24, 2026
City of Oakland440,6465,433266,753September 24, 2026
City of Riverside314,9984,875216,171September 24, 2026
City of Santa Ana310,227748+54,906September 24, 2026

Each figure comes from that organization’s own crawl; a + marks a crawl that stopped at a limit, so its count is a minimum. The table compares document inventories, not accessibility.

All organizations in California serving 250,000 to 999,999 people

Related organizations

Cities in California

Also due April 26, 2027 in California

Frequently asked questions

When is City of Sacramento's ADA Title II deadline?

April 26, 2027. City of Sacramento is in the 2027 cohort under the Department of Justice's rule on web and mobile accessibility for state and local governments, with compliance dates as set by the Department's interim final rule of April 20, 2026 (91 FR 20902).

How was City of Sacramento's deadline set?

City of Sacramento's total population is 524,943 (2020 Census), at or above the 50,000 threshold in 28 CFR 35.200(b), so the earlier compliance date applies.

How many public documents does City of Sacramento have?

Our crawl on September 24, 2026 fetched 75 pages from https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/ and found 4,859 documents, an estimated 400,256 pages. The full file-level list is available to verified staff after claiming the page.

How many of City of Sacramento's documents pass accessibility checks?

7 of the 50 files we checked passed basic machine checks (14%). That is a sample of the 4,859 documents we found, and passing basic checks is not full WCAG 2.1 AA conformance.

How much would it cost to fix City of Sacramento's documents?

Our directional estimate is $368,970 to $553,455 with DocoMatic: about 1,844,850 credits for 400,256 estimated pages, based on this crawl. It is not a quote.

Which documents should City of Sacramento fix first?

Start with the documents residents actually download: agendas, minutes, permit applications and utility forms.

Do older PDFs have to be made accessible too?

Not all of them. Documents already posted before the compliance date are excepted unless they are currently used to apply for, gain access to, or participate in the organization's services, programs or activities (28 CFR 35.201(b)). Genuinely archived content is excepted too, but only while it is kept solely for reference, research or recordkeeping, sits in a clearly identified archive area and is not changed. Everything published from the compliance date on is covered, and so is any older file people still use to reach a service.